Search This Blog

Showing posts with label causes. Show all posts
Showing posts with label causes. Show all posts

Wednesday, December 14, 2016

Thoughts during the calm

Calm Janey
My friend Julie said to me recently that it seemed like life with Janey was evening out as time went by.  That struck me as a very good way to put it.  The last year with Janey has mostly been a year of evening out.  Her lows are higher, her highs lower, and she spends more time in the middle.  There's still tough days, and still amazing days, but most days are..days.  Which is good.  Which is very good, actually, compared to some of the hard times. Whatever it is---her getting older, her now being essentially an only child as her brothers are both away at college, the right combination of medication, a stable school situations, our changes in attitude and strategies---life with Janey is much smoother than it was a few years ago.

That's why it seems strange to me that more than I have in years, I have been thinking about tough questions.  Why is Janey autistic?  Why, unlike so many kids with autism, has she made so little progress with speech and academics?  Why is it so hard to get help with her?  I guess when we are not in crisis mode, but also not being blinded by exciting new things Janey is doing, there is time to sit back and think, and sometimes the thinking is hard.

I never used to dwell much on why Janey is autistic. A lot of that is because there is no shortage of potential reasons.  Pretty much every time a new idea comes out as to what causes autism, it is something that applies to Janey.  I had a terrible pregnancy with her, with a severe allergic drug reaction at 12 weeks.  Tony was, at age 42 at the time of her conception, an older father.  Genetics can't be ruled out, and auto-immune disease run rampart through both sides of the family.  We live near a busy street, and pollution certainly could be a factor.  I could go on and on.  But still, I wonder. Was there something I could have done differently?

As for why Janey has progressed so little, that's harder to say.  And more heartbreaking.  So, so many little kids that start out at the same place as Janey make so much progress.  They have the same resources and teaching Janey did, and now they can talk easily, can read, can write, can function at a hugely higher level than her.  I love Janey just the way she is, but for her, I wish she had made the leaps some kids do.  The evening out applies to her progress, too.  She talks less than she has at times, her toilet training has regressed to less than it was, she is in some ways more affected by autism than she was at 6 or 7.  I don't know why.  The same question comes up here---was there something I could have done differently?

And why, WHY, is it so hard to get help with Janey?   Why does it seem that those charged with helping children with special needs don't understand children like Janey, children whose needs are fairly extreme, and because of that, children in families that need help so badly?  As an example, over and over this holiday season I've heard about ToysRUs and Target and so on having special "quiet" shopping hours for kids with autism.  And although it probably sounds petty and mean, I think "Bah Humbug"  That is an example of the kind of help that is no help at all to someone like Janey.  She would not be quiet for a quiet shopping time.  She doesn't understand shopping for toys.  She has no desire for toys.  And most of all, taking her shopping is NOT a source of help for us.  It's more stress, not more help. What would be a million times more helpful is if the stores somehow arranged for someone to actually watch kids like Janey so Tony and I could shop.

I know there's money out there to help kids with autism.  I've talked with people working for various agencies.  But the money seems to go into a couple fairly useless areas. It goes into "awareness", or it goes into "family events".  Well, if you have a kid like Janey, you are pretty darn aware of autism.  And if you have a kid like Janey, just getting out of the house with her is tough enough.  It is really not any help to have some kind of event to go to with her unless it is catered to kids LIKE her, kids with high need autism.  And even if it is, that's not respite.  That's not a break.  It might be fun, like going to the Lego playland or the Autism Eats Out events, but it's not really help.  Quite simply, help is RESPITE.  Help is someone else taking care for Janey for a while.  It's that simple.  It's that simple to state, but it's very, very hard to find.

Having the time and energy to think about the larger autism issues is a luxury. I am very grateful things are calmer than they were with Janey, and I knock on wood to hope they stay calm.  Progress or no, respite or not, reasons  known or not, she is a remarkable, wonderful girl---my sweet precious Janey.  I am lucky to be her mother.

Monday, August 8, 2016

What I am tired of

I'm tired of being on edge 24 hours a day, 7 days a week.  I'm tired of never, ever being able to fully let my guard down.

I'm tired of cleaning up messes.  I'm tired of changing sheets, always having a huge pile of blankets waiting to be washed, tired of the type of pull-up disaster that still happens way too often.

I'm tired of screaming.  I'm tired of not knowing why the screaming is happening.

I'm tired of reading about possible causes of autism, which all seem designed to make me feel guilty, because it seems like every single one is something I've done or taken or not done or not taken.

I'm tired of rude people that stare.

I'm tired of worrying.  I'm tired of being scared that someone will hurt Janey when I'm not with her.  I'm tired of feeling panicked when Janey comes home from school upset, because I have no idea what might have happened to upset her.

I'm tired of the same episodes of the same TV shows, year after year after year.

I'm tired of not even counting on a full night's sleep.

I'm tired of dreading the future, especially the part of the future that will happen when I am dead and gone.

I'm tired of IEP meetings.

I'm tired of hearing about great new camps or lessons or programs or events that Janey can't be part of.

I'm tired of having to advocate.  I'm tired of having to figure out backdoor ways to get the services Janey needs.

I'm tired of feeling angry---angry at celebrities who have "cured" their kids, angry at politicians who don't even have the slightest idea what life with an autistic child is like, tired of feel-good stories about wonder dogs or magic trips to Mongolia or miracle breakthroughs.

I'm tired of being tired.  Physically tired, all the time, every single day.

Soon, very soon, I'll write about the joys of autism, or more specifically, the joy Janey brings me.  But today, I am tired.

Monday, November 9, 2015

In an alternative timeline

I read a lot of books about time travel and alternative timelines and parallel universes and the like.  I don't really believe in any of them, but thinking about them fascinates me and often makes for some very good reading.  Usually, though, I don't put such thoughts to use on my own life, or Janey's life.  This weekend, I did.

I saw several pictures on Facebook on Saturday morning of kids preparing to take the Boston exam school test.  They were kids that started kindergarten with Janey, and it hit me that if Janey had stayed in their grade, if Janey had developed typically, she would have been taking the test on Saturday.  The test determines if you get into one of Boston's exam schools.  Janey's brother Freddy went to Boston Latin School, as did my husband Tony (William also got in, but chose not to go).  Freddy and Tony had a great experience with the school.  It's a special place---the oldest school in America (founded in 1635!)  And it's so far removed from any educational route Janey is taking that it might as well be on the moon.

I let myself spend a few minutes, after seeing those pictures (which were great to see, and I am truly happy and excited to think of kids I know Janey's age going to Latin), what it would be like if Janey were "normal".  More specifically, what would this past weekend have looked like?  Well, we would be nervous about the test.  We'd have taken her there early, to stand in line.  She would have had to go in herself, as the boys did, and we would have gone home and thought about her.  After the test, we would have talked about it, and maybe gone out to lunch.  Then, we would have done what we did in the regular timeline---picked up both Freddy and William at the train station, both of them visiting from college for a bit.  She would have listened to their college stories, and told them her own exam stories.

As I write this, I am crying.  Usually, I don't mourn the Janey that could have been.  It's a useless thing to do.  That Janey doesn't exist.  I love the Janey I do have.  But somehow, I got a vision of that Janey, what she would look like, talk like, be like.  And it made me heartbroken, for a few minutes, thinking about all she is missing.  She is missing so much of life.  She won't just not go to Latin.  She won't go to college.  She won't get married.  She won't have children.  Her life is not going to have the milestones, the joys, that so many people can take for granted.  And I usually would pipe in here, reminding myself and others that she also won't have some of the heartbreaks life brings, but I don't feel like it, right now.  Those heartbreaks are worth it, for the great joys that the things she will miss can bring.

And why?  That's another thing I don't usually dwell on.  But why is Janey autistic, and severely developmentally delayed?  What happened?  I have no shortage of possible reasons, but that doesn't really help.  Why doesn't she progress in the way that most kids with autism seem to progress?  Why, even in her autism program, does she seem so far behind?  What have I done wrong?  I know the answer is that it's not me, but of course, I ask that anyway, in private.  And I guess here, in public.

Most of the time, I can rejoice in the Janey I do have.  But sometimes, I feel life has been very unfair to her.  Not to me.  To her.  I wish I could say "But she doesn't know any differently!  She's happy as she is!"  But she isn't happy, much of the time.  She's not happy at all so often.  She suffers, emotionally and sometimes physically.  She might not know specifically what she is missing out on, but I think she does see that life is more frustrating to her than it is for many others.

And now I will bury these thoughts again for a while.  There are some things you can't think about very often.

Wednesday, November 12, 2014

My First Guest Post! Guest Author---Freddy Amara, Janey's brother

Hello Rarer In Girls readers,
My name is Freddy, Suzanne's middle child.  I am 17 years old and currently a senior in high school.  My mother had requested that I write a guest blog entry about how Janey has affected my childhood.  I responded that I would be happy to; this blog has had a profound impact on my mother's life, as there is a wonderful community of more than just readers.  You all have let my mother---and my family---know that we are not alone.  Your support is incredible, and I personally thank you for reading my mother's entries and giving her support.


This is how Janey has changed my life.


It hasn't been easy with a little sister with autism.  I wish she wasn't autistic, obviously, as I feel I
cannot have conversations with her that I could have had with her had she been normal. However, I love her the way she is. I have a special connection with her that nobody else has, much the same as a normal brother and sister would have.   My personality has certainly been altered because of Janey.  I feel like I am more tolerant and patient than many other people my age.


One of the hardest parts of being a sibling of somebody mentally disabled is the misunderstanding among everyone else.   The usage of the word "retarded" has died down over the past few years, however, each time somebody uses it in an offensive context, I feel a sharp pain.  They don't know what it's like. The nights of screaming, the stares in public, the fear for the future.  I try to explain to people when they use the word how deeply it can hurt.


My parents have been great in my opinion. Ever since her diagnosis, they have made it clear that for my childhood, Janey is our shared responsibility; more theirs than mine and my brother's, however, there will come a time that when my parents will not be able to care for her anymore, and she will be our responsibility.  I accept this, as does my brother.  I do help out with Janey often, but my parents have let me have an otherwise completely normal childhood, and they care for me just as much as they would have had Janey not been autistic.  In a way, Janey's autism has given me more freedom than I would have had otherwise, for a huge chunk of their attention is spent caring for her.   This is good for me, I have learned independence at a younger age than others, and my parents have learned to trust me with my schoolwork and don't bother me about when I do my studies.


It should be said that I'm writing this on my own, my mother doesn't even know I already wrote this.  She'll proofread it before posting, I'm sure.


Autism is a scary thing.  I want to have children when I am older and have a family, however, it is widely unknown what causes autism, and it is possible that genetics play a role.  I have questioned whether I want to have children despite the risk of autism.  I know I'm quite young and I shouldn't worry about it yet at this age, but I can't help it.  I'm glad my parents had me, and to all of those parents out there who had an autistic child as your first, it must be a tough decision whether you should have more children.  It's not my place to say, I'm just happy that I exist, and I think I'll take the risk someday of being a father.


It is nice all the support people give towards finding the cause of autism, however, as my mother has likely spoken about before on this blog is that the public doesn't seem to care as much about helping families that have already had children with autism.  Many things could cause autism, or any other mental illness for that matter, and so I agree with my mother that it would be nice if there was more support or awareness for those who have a loved one already diagnosed.  I feel like I should follow in my mother's footsteps in raising awareness somehow.  How, I don't know.  I believe just letting people know how common autism is is the first step.  Not only that, but the effect it has on our lives.  You all reading this already do know and care, and so I thank you.  My only request is that you tell somebody about autism who might not know its effects on families, and maybe even share this blog with them.

Thursday, September 25, 2014

Okay, Scientists, You Got Me Again!

Once in a while, I have a sneaking suspicion that autism researchers are messing with me.  I think they get together and say "Okay, let's pull up Suzanne's medical history and that of her family, look at everyplace she has lived and all the circumstances of her pregnancies and childbirths.  We'll pick something new from all of that this month to release as a possible cause of autism.  Wait 'til we see the look on her face!"  Of course, I'm not truly that paranoid or self-centered, but sometimes it's amazing how many potential causes of autism would work for me.



The newest is iron intake.  I have almost always tested as anemic, and that was very much the case during all my pregnancies.  With Janey, it was exasperated by the fact that the iron I was taking seemed to interfere with my thyroid medication.  Because having a thyroid basically not working was considered much more dangerous than having a low iron count, for the last half of the pregnancy, I didn't take iron.  I tried hard to eat a lot of red meat (despite popular belief, I was told it's a far better source of iron than green vegetables), but still, my iron remained low.  So there's another reason for Janey's autism!  It joins a nice long list, including the low thyroid itself, a family history of autoimmune disorders, my allergic reaction to Aldomet at 12 weeks pregnancy, the fact I live near a major street, several possibly on the spectrum people in Tony's family and mine, Tony being an older father, my living my first 6 years near Lake Eire at its most polluted with PCBs, preeclampsia during my pregnancy, birth trauma (Janey's umbilical cord was around her neck twice)....that's just the ones I can think of easily off the top of my head.

Those scientists missed the boat with ONE potential cause I saw the news today---having children very close together.  However, I'm not out of the woods with that one, because if you wait TOO long to have a child, over 5 years (there is 7 years between Janey and Freddy, exactly), the risk of autism again rises by 30%.

What do I do with all this?  Not much.  There isn't anything I can change from the past, and I'm certainly not planning on having any more children---I'm 48.  I am glad research is being done, but all joking aside, the fact that so many of the factor apply to me is probably the case with many parents of autistic kids.  There are so many potential reasons thrown out there that I couldn't imagine being a pregnant woman trying to avoid all of them.  There's just too many.  I think about this in terms of my sons someday.  If they become fathers, there were certainly right off the bat be an increased risk of them having a child with autism, and I feel for their future wives thinking about them trying to avoid any further risk.

Do I sometimes feel guilty about all the risk factors that might have affected Janey?  Of course I do.  I know I shouldn't, but guilt isn't a logical emotion.  I don't obsess over it, but I think about it.  I get angry about a few of them, especially the Aldomet reaction.  I wonder if I should have had a C-section---if a good ultrasound could have seen the cord around Janey's neck.  I worry I didn't do enough to keep my iron up.  I have other worries, the kind that suddenly hit you in the middle of the night and aren't logical, but the middle of the night brain isn't good at logic.

I hope some day, all the possible causes of autism are narrowed down, or at least better defined, so that knowledge of them can be incorporated into prenatal care and PREprenatal planning.  I suspect, though, that no matter what, we'll never totally have answers about autism's cause.  I hope society will do its very best to support the children that, despite all the research, still develop autism.

Wednesday, April 2, 2014

My own personal autism awareness wish list

Here it is, World Autism Awareness Day again.  I've been saying to myself what I say to myself every year on this date---I think I'm about as aware of autism as I can get.  However, I've been thinking about what I'd like others to know about autism.  Here's a list of the top four things I'd like the world in general to know.  It's my own personal list---I am sure that everyone with a life touched by autism has their own list, different in many ways, but I can only speak for myself.

Most autism you see portrayed in the media is high-functioning autism.

There is a huge, huge range of abilities and characteristics all lumped together as "autism".  In the past, there was actually a separate name for the highest end of autism, Aspergers Syndrome.  But the powers that be, for whatever reason, have now lumped that in with all the rest.  If you see Temple Grandin, or hear about Daryl Hannah, or even see the often hilarious Autistic Reporter on The Onion, you are seeing very, very high functioning autism.  On the other end, there are children and adults like Janey.  Janey is nine.  She is not toilet trained.  She cannot be left unsupervised for a minute.  She can talk a little, but mostly only in scripted "I want.." sentences or in repeated phrases from videos.  She screams, cries, injures herself and doesn't sleep regularly.  Academically, she functions about at a 2 year old level.  She is autism, as much as people with college degrees can be autism.

I am not looking for a cause of autism or a cure for autism.

There are many, many possible causes of autism.  Janey's autism could have been caused by any number of them.  In our daily life, it doesn't much matter what caused her to be autistic.  And in Janey's particular case, there is not going to be a cure.  I am not sure there ever is a cure for correctly diagnosed autism, but many disagree with me there, and that's fine.  However, I don't choose to pursue a cure for Janey.

Autism affects family life extremely severely.

If you've ever spent even an hour with a child with autism, especially low-functioning autism, you were probably exhausted after that hour.  Imagine that you have that child living in your house, every day, every night.  Imagine that you can never, ever count on a full night's sleep, that at any moment, your child might start screaming or crying or biting themselves or trying to bite you, and that there seems to be no reason for this behavior and no way to soothe them.  Imagine that you can never, ever count on going out in public as a family and having it go smoothly.  Imagine that even close friends who would do anything to help you have admitted they can't watch Janey, even for a few hours.  Imagine that you must sometimes make choices like whether to listen to a sibling tell you about their tough day or follow the rituals the autistic child demands, and if you pick the sibling, you know you'll be dealing with hours of screaming.  Imagine a life that autism touches every single second, every single aspect of.  That is family life with our particular brand of autism.

I love Janey more than I can possibly describe, and that guides all my decisions about her.

It is the most important thing in the world to me that Janey be loved, cared for and valued.  I make every decision about her life with that in mind.  For example, I am not sending her to summer school this year, because I am not comfortable with the program.  I need respite, but more than that, I need to know Janey is safe and loved, just as any parent has that need for their child.  In Janey's case, since she can't usefully tell me what happens when I'm not with her, I have to be ever-vigilant about who is caring for her when I am not there.  At this point, I can't compromise on this---I can't accept less when letting her out of my sight.  Maybe that is my biggest point.  There needs to be quality education, care and respite for children with autism, because they deserve it every bit as much as any child.  Without that, the burden on many families is near unbearable.

To all my friends, to all my readers, to everyone who has helped me through this life, and especially to Janey----Happy Autism Awareness Day!

Thursday, November 7, 2013

Chocolate---or why I don't discount anyone's theories...

Usually, getting to sleep is not a problem for Janey.  Waking in the night is a huge problem, but we almost never have trouble actually getting her down for bed the first time in the night.  She usually does it herself.  Bedtime rolls around, she gets in bed and goes to sleep.  It's that easy.  Last night, though, something was off.  Bedtime came and went, and she was rocking and rolling and hyped up.  We tried over and over to get her to settle down---no luck.  Finally, ten o'clocked rolled around and she finally dozed off.  Tony and I talked for quite a bit trying to figure out what had happened, when Tony suddenly remembered.  When Janey got home from school, she ate the top off a chocolate frosted Dunkin' Donuts doughnut.  There we had it, the culprit.  We have long seen that if Janey has any, ANY, chocolate past around noon, she doesn't sleep.  It's only chocolate that does this.  She can have the occasional sip of coffee, or tons of sugar, or any other edible substance and she gets to sleep fine, but one M&M?  Forget it.

Thinking about this made me realize why I try very hard not to discount anyone else's theories or ideas about autism.  The chocolate thing seems on the face of it to make little sense.  Why only chocolate?  Why such a tiny amount?  It makes so little sense to the scientific part of my brain I tend to forget it over and over, and again let her have "just a little" chocolate.  And again and again, we see the results.  This is why, although I don't think lactose or gluten affect Janey at all, I am quite sure that they do affect some kids with autism, and those kids are helped by diets without those substances.  And why, although I don't think my children were affected badly by vaccines, I am sure that some children were.  And the list goes on and on.  I truly don't think autism has one cause.  It has lots of causes.  I have settled in my mind on the main cause of Janey's autism being a huge family propensity to auto-immune disorders, which hit her hard.  I have finally gotten a fairly solid diagnosis in my latest round of medical weird test results--Sjogren's Syndrome (here's a good article about it if you want to know more---link), which is heavily autoimmune.  This adds to my life list of autoimmune woes---thyroid disease, asthma and pre-eclampsia being the other ones.  Both of Janey's brothers have asthma, and Tony is an insulin-dependent diabetic (as is most all of his family).  All autoimmune problems, and there are more in our extended family.  The doctor explained to me yesterday that it's been found recently there is a gene that greatly increases one's propensity to get an auto-immune disease, and our family is illustration number one.  Thankfully, although I have blood markers also for Scleroderma, the doctor doesn't think I yet have that, just that I need to be very closely watched as there is a high chance I'll develop it in time.  Not to ramble about family medical issues, but that is why in Janey's case, I feel increasingly sure we know the "why".  But there's not one WHY for everyone, and there's not one cure for everyone (or any cure at all for many, many of the people with autism).  If I hear about a miracle breakthrough for one child, I am thrilled for that child, but I don't assume it will translate to helping other kids.

I very much understand why, if you had a child that someone got cured by some diet or treatment, or if you had a child that you were sure had autism caused by a vaccine, you would want to get the word out, and you would feel frustrated that everyone didn't try the diet, or rally against the vaccines.  You love your child, and you also want to help others.  When I keep that in mind, I can understand some of the strong emotions out there regarding treatments or cures.  I can listen to them, and accept that they did help some kids, and also feel secure in my own convictions about what hurt and what helps Janey.  I'm sure many kids like Janey could wolf down a pound bag of M&Ms before bedtime and do fine.  That doesn't mean that I am deluded in my belief that one single M&M can cause a sleepless night for Janey, and it doesn't mean they are deluded in thinking it doesn't affect their child.  We are both right.  We know our kids.  We have to all work together, no matter what got us to this autism life.

Tuesday, June 18, 2013

The credit and the blame

In the bad old days, autism was thought to be caused by "refrigerator mothers", mothers who hadn't really wanted their kids to start with and therefore showed them little human emotion.  I would say almost no-one thinks that any more, thankfully.  Although I think most autism mothers, like most mothers in general, search their memories of their pregnancy and birth and their child's early days, trying to figure out WHY, most of us do know that our child's autism is not our fault.  We didn't cause it.  We might not know what caused it, but it wasn't something we did deliberately or even indirectly.  We don't take the blame, at least on our better days.

I'm wondering, then, why so many mothers feel it is there job to FIX the autism.  We can accept we didn't cause it, that nothing we did made our kids they way they are.  The inverse of that is that although most mothers tried always to do everything right, they were powerless to prevent autism.  However, although we can sort of accept that powerlessness and blamelessness, we can't accept we don't have the power to cure autism.  We feel, somehow, that if we do everything right, if we try just the right combination of therapies or diets or experiences or schools or approaches or medication or supplements or so on, we will fix the autism. We believe in people who say they did just that---people who write books about the miracle cures for their children.  We give ourselves in our minds the power, if we just try hard enough, to fix what has happened.

I am trying hard to not do this.  I'm trying to be consistent.  I know I didn't cause Janey's autism.  I don't know what did cause it.  And because I didn't have the power to keep her from becoming autistic, I also want to accept I don't have the power to overcome the autism.  That in no way means I'm not going to keep working to make her life better, just as when I was pregnant or when she was a baby, I did everything I could to give her the best start I could.

This is where my older son comes in.  He was also at one point, when he was very young, diagnosed with autism.  That was changed within a few years to an Aspergers diagnosis.  When he was 8, testing showed he no longer fell into the autism spectrum.  When he was 12, we stopped having him on an IEP at school.  Last week, he graduated from high school as valedictorian of his class.  He heads to Brandeis in the fall.  This is where I have to practice what I preach.  I don't take the credit for his "recovery"  I think he was misdiagnosed, but even if that wasn't the case, it wasn't anything I did or didn't do that "fixed" him.  He did that himself.  It was what was meant to be.  I am proud of him, but I in no way at all take credit for him.  If I did, it would follow I should take blame for Janey not being cured, being in fact very much the same as she was when she was diagnosed 5 years ago.

I believe in autism acceptance, mostly.  And I think that needs to mean an absence of credit or blame.  Janey is who she is.  She is a full, complete, complex person just as she is.  Talking about credit or blame makes her sound like a project, not a person.  The same holds true with William, my older son.  As tempting as it can be to feel we can really change our children, I truly believe we can't.  We can soften their path, we can give them opportunities to shine in their areas of talent or interest, we can be there when they fall or need our help, but they are people on their own.  I'm not quite there yet, in fully believing that, but I am working toward it.

Tuesday, May 21, 2013

Unlikely things autism has made me say

We never spill Cheerios all over Freddy's bed.  That's not funny!

We don't eat mayonaisse/ketchup/duck sauce all by itself.

Yes, she's eight.  No, she's not toilet trained.  Yes, I've tried all the methods out there.

No, I haven't put her on a gluten free diet.  

We NEVER take off our seat belt in the car and go into the front seat and hit Mama.

No, we can't go buy chips right now.  It's 3am.

Even if you put on your shoes nicely, we aren't going to the store right now.  It's 4am.

Please go back to sleep.  I'm not talking about chips any more.

Tony, could you just go buy her some damn chips?  It's 5am and I haven't slept.

No, I don't know what caused her autism.  Do you know what caused you to ask questions like that?

No, I don't think vaccines had anything to do with it.

Janey, please, if you make a stinky on the floor, tell Mama or Daddy about it.  Don't make us hunt it out.

If there were all kinds of great free respite services for autism out there, don't you think I'd be using them?

I really appreciate the thought, but a toy with 100 small pieces she could choke on is not really something we need, even if Janey does fall in the age range on the box.

No, I don't know how I do it either.  

That's enough pickled vegetables for today, Janey.

I know your dog wouldn't hurt a fly, but the fact you and others let dogs run free and knock down my daughter who is terrified of dogs has caused us to no longer be able to go to most parks.

Big girls don't take off all their clothes.

We just had two baths today.  That's enough baths.

We don't brush our teeth 20 times a day.

No, Janey doesn't really have any beer on ice and all her rowdy friends aren't coming over tonight.  She just is a Hank Jr. fan who \memorizes songs and sings them at random times.

Thank you, teachers and aides and therapists and staff of Janey's school.  I think I'd be dead without you, without a place to take Janey where I know she's safe and loved.  I wouldn't make it.  Literally.

Janey, I don't think it would be possible for me to love you any more than I do.  I wish you were going to have an easier life.  I wish you could communicate more.  I wish you could tell us what makes you sad.  But that doesn't change the fact that you are one amazing kid.






Tuesday, March 26, 2013

On tiredness, autoimmune issues and autism

The last month or so, a doctor's appointment I had yesterday was hanging over my head.  I had a lot of blood tests a while ago, to try to figure out why my liver function is always a little compromised.  One of the tests done was an ANA test.  I don't know all the technical terms, but I know it's a test done for autoimmune disorders, and I know over the years I've had it done quite a few times, because of the severe preeclampsia I developed during pregnancy and also because of my thyroid issues.  It's always been negative until this last time, when it was positive.  The breakdown of what exactly was positive showed I might have something called scleroderma, as well as Sjogren's syndrome.  I of course did what I do, and started researching them a lot, and convinced myself I did have scleroderma, and dreaded the appointment as I felt it would confirm that.  However, the doctor said she had quite a list of autoimmune diseases she thought I might have, but scleroderma was low on the list.  She did think I have Sjogren's syndrome, which mostly just causes dry eyes and a dry mouth.  She ordered a bunch more blood tests and an echocardiogram, which I had yesterday.  So now I'm waiting for the blood tests.  Because I just love to self-diagnose and scare myself, I figured out from a few things she said and the questions she asks that she probably thinks I have lupus, which has been suspected in the past but the negative ANAs in the past always ruled out.  I have the facial rash which is characteristic.  But I don't know yet, and I shouldn't worry about things I don't know about.  But I do, of course.

I write all this not to ramble about medical issues, but because to me it ties into autism.  If autism is a type of auto-immune syndrome, or if that is one of the causes, then Janey certainly comes by it naturally.  In addition to all the things I have or think I have, our family history features tons of diabetes and asthma, plenty of thyroid issues and thyroid cancer, Raynaud's syndrome, among other auto-immune fun.  It makes the most sense to me of the various possible causes of autism that in Janey's case, she developed autism as an autoimmune response which affected her brain.  I think autism has multiple causes, and I don't think everyone  with autism got it that way.  It's like saying someone has a fever, or wheezing.  You can get a fever or wheezing for lots of reasons.

The main way I think I'm being affected by whatever it is that is affecting me is tiredness.  I tried to explain to the doctor yesterday what this kind of tiredness is like.  It's not like how you feel when you don't get a good night's sleep, although I get that kind too.  It's a toxic kind of tiredness, a feeling that if I don't lie down and nap, I will pass out. It hits me with a huge force.  I can't possibly keep from sleeping when it hits.  Over the past few months, I've given in to this more.  Naps used to be my guilty secret.  I felt like I had to hide the fact I need a nap every day.  Now, I am allowing myself to work it into my regular day.  I need to nap an hour or two each day to make it through the day.  Extreme tiredness is a huge part of lupus and scleroderma, and other autoimmune diseases, and that makes me feel a little less guilty about it.

If Janey didn't go to school, and after-school, and summer school, if I didn't have Tony on weekends, I don't think I could make it.  Days I've been home alone with her, when the nap urge hits, it gets scary.  I try to avoid that at all costs.  If I can't, I barricade the living room as best I can, put Janey on my lap, put on the TV to a show she loves and catnap, waking every minute or so to make sure she's okay.  That doesn't really give me the rest I crave, but it's the best I can do.

Autism doesn't exist in a vacuum.  We all have other issues in our lives and our families besides autism.  It's why autism respite is SO important.  If I were a single parent, or if Janey had a shorter school day or no summer school, I don't know what would happen.  She would be endangered, and so would I.  I hope the supports I have stay in place.  But I feel for those without such supports, and I worry about those families.

Sunday, January 6, 2013

"What happened?"---the pictures

Yesterday, when I was cleaning up a pile of clutter, I found an old calendar I had had made, one of those Shutterfly type things where you pick pictures of your family to use.  It was beat up, from having been lying around, but the pictures were still enough to prompt Tony to say something I don't think I've ever heard him say before---"What happened?"  He was looking at pictures of Janey (here's one)
and seeing what we sometimes just can't look at, because it's so hard---how un-autistic she used to be.  We don't talk about her regression a lot.  It's far too hard to think about.  Sometimes it's easier just to pretend in our minds that Janey was always the way she was.  But she wasn't.  Until she was almost 3, she was not autistic.  Not at all.  She had a few oddities, she was very delayed physically, but you can look in those eyes and see---she wasn't autistic.  She talked far more than she does now.  She was a quirky talker---but she talked.  I sometimes have trouble even remembering or believing how she used to talk.  But I know by age 2 she was telling people they were her "best friend forever"---sometimes Freddy, sometimes my friend's daughter Julia, who she called Jua.  I know that just before we left for our cross-country trip, we visited my parents at a campground, and my mother commented on the chipmunks and the mockingbirds, and Janey said "I want to see the chipmonkeys and the knockingbirds!"  I know her doctor, at 18 months, said "Well, at least we know she's not autistic" when she spend all of her brother's appointment trying to get his attention.  I know the PT that worked with her from Early Intervention often said "I love seeing Janey and hearing what she has to say".  And then...it all went away.

Here's another picture from that calendar...
Those eyes that looked right at you---they are hard to see now.  What did happen?  We will never know, probably.  A couple months before her 3rd birthday, I remember distinctly the first moment of doubt.  We were at the science museum, with my friend I just mentioned, Maryellen.  Janey was talking to herself as she looked at a dinosaur.  She was being very self-absorbed, and I said something lightly like "she loves imaginative play like that!" and Maryellen said, hesitantly "I don't really think she's being imaginative".  That planted a seed, and I was watching Janey intently, and starting to see a few few odd signs---she was a little less engaged, she seemed to be talking a little less.  But it was nothing severe.  I asked another friend, who is a special ed teacher and who knew Janey well, if she thought Janey seemed like she could be on the spectrum.  She gave it good thought and said no, she really didn't think so.

And then the trip.  We drove cross-country---6 days out and 6 days back, staying out there for a week in between.  Janey left for that trip not autistic.  She came back autistic.  She turned 3 during the trip.  Whatever was waiting to happen to her brain happened then.  I don't think the trip caused her autism, but we wrack our brains to think if anything happened.  Did she somehow have a stroke from being in the car a lot?  She's had an MRI since then, and there were no signs of a stroke. We stopped often, but could that have happened?  Was she so tramautized by all the hotels and different houses it changed her somehow?  It hardly seems likely.  Was she too bored in the car?  Freddy sat next to her the whole way, and interacted with her constantly.  My best guess is what was going to happen had already started to happen, and the trip just somehow rushed it, or was coincidentally at the same time.

There are a few videos of Janey pre-autism.  I wish I could share them with you here, but I can't.  I can't watch them at all.  I tried, once.  I fell apart.  I screamed.  It was too hard.

I love the Janey I have, but I loved that other Janey too.  Of course she's the same person, but Tony's question, one we don't allow ourselves to ask often, is heartbreaking.  What did happen?

Here's one last picture of Janey from the calendar, before I put it away and not look at it for a while.



Saturday, November 24, 2012

What Made Janey Autistic #3 in a series

From as early back as I can remember, for some reason, I've been fascinated with genetics.  I've read everything I can find about it.  My sister shares this interest, and we actually used to pretend that our dolls suffered from a rare genetic disease we called Ingalls' Syndrome (I think we were into Laura Ingalls Wilder at the time).  It has symptoms that made dolls, well, doll-like---floppy and not too good at walking on their own.  My sister Carrie came close to going into genetic counselling, and I've kept up my interest through reading over the years.

Genetics, however, when it comes in the form of possibly genetic-linked traits, is not quite as thrilling when it happens to  your family.  But it's certainly a possibility for a cause for Janey's autism.  And a delicate subject.  I'm not going to list family members on both sides with oddities that might be somewhat autism-related, but suffice to say they exist, for sure.  Nobody has full blown autism, but both sides of the family tree are peppered with quirky people.  It's certainly possible that some genes came together that were enough to give Janey autism, or more likely put her in a vulnerable state where getting autism was more likely.

I've always wondered if it's possible Janey has some genetic disease that hasn't been identified, maybe a mild version of one or a mosaic version.  She has a few physical soft markers, little oddities.  One is her toes---the 2nd and 3rd toe overlap, and they are slightly conjoined---not connected, but they seem to share a common root.  She has angel bite type birthmarks when she was a baby that still show up when she cries hard.  A pediatrician at the clinic that diagnosed her said her heart was in an odd position--she even said she thought it might be on the wrong side, but my pediatrician said at most it's more in the middle of the chest than most people's hearts.  She had the late walking, but that's fairly common in autism.  And there was the one MRI way back that showed she had some white matter in her brain where it was supposed to be gray matter, some little dots of it I guess.  But a further MRI didn't show that.  So little things, which of course I've Googled to see if they fit into any pattern, and haven't found one, as of yet.

I do believe that genetics are a huge force in making us what we are, more than most people think or like to think.  I'm fairly sure that genetics have something to do with Janey's autism.  It's another component, along with the first two parts in this series.  When gene analysis gets even better, I might see if a geneticist can have a look at her genes, but at this point, the genetics of autism isn't at an advanced enough point to make that worth it, I don't think.  Until then, I'll call genetics a strong maybe as a cause.

Wednesday, November 14, 2012

What Made Janey Autistic #2 in a series

I want to say before I start this entry that I am not a doctor, obviously, and I am using medical ideas to write this that I have remembered along the way.  Please don't take them for hard facts, as they could be wrong!  What I'm trying to do here is give my thoughts based on what I've read and heard, which is I think what we all try to do with figuring out this autism bit!

That said, my theory #2 of what caused Janey's autism is that autism is an autoimmune disease, and our family is for some reason heavily prone to autoimmune diseases.  As I understand it, an autoimmune disease is one in which the body's own defense mechanisms get overactive and attack the body they are supposed to be protecting.  The idea is that something triggers the body to start attacking the brain at some point, causing autism.  It could be some little sickness we can't even remember the child having, or some other trigger that is impossible to figure out.

Our family tree is full of examples of diseases that are at least in part autoimmune.  I have a pretty much non-functioning thyroid and have to take large doses of thyroid replacement every day.  I also have asthma.  When I was pregnant with 2 of my 3 kids, I had pre-eclampsia, which is thought to be another AID (auto-immune disorder, so I don't have to keep writing it!)  Tony is an insulin-dependent diabetic, a type that is kind of a cross between type one and type 2.  Freddy has asthma like me.  My mother has Raynaud's Disease.  My sister, my mother, Freddy and myself all have pretty severe seasonal allergies.  My sister had thyroid cancer.  My uncle and grandmother had or have disfunctional thyroids, like myself.  Almost everyone in Tony's family has the same kind of diabetes he does---his brothers, his father and many aunts and uncles and cousins.  The list could go on and on.  We are poster kids for AID.

One, someplace, I read that another sign of being prone to AID is when the MMR vaccine doesn't take as a child.  Both my sister Carrie and I were tested when we were at child-bearing ages, and were found to be not immune to rubella, and had to have another shot.  Our immune system fought off even the vaccine dose as kids, and didn't therefore get the immunity.

The AID-autism connection just makes sense to me.  You aren't born with AID.  Something triggers them.  That would explain why kids develop autism as they get exposed to more things in the environment.  Some people are pre-disposed to AID---not every kid is going to be triggered to be autistic.

A weird thing that also seems like a connection to me is how rarely Janey gets sick.  She doesn't get the colds or flus or viruses that go through her classes.  She's missed almost no school days due to illness in years.  William, who was originally also thought to be on the spectrum, is the same way.  Freddy gets everything that goes down the pike and more, so it's not just a family trait to not get sick.  I think Janey's immune system is overactive.  She gets rid of any illness that comes around, and does so overactively.  I can see how at one point, something might have triggered her body to go all out on attack, and mistakenly went for her brain, too.

As with the pregnancy/fever/flu theory, the AID theory could easily explain Janey's autism.  I wish it were the last thing that could, but there's more!  #3 in this series is coming soon.


Monday, November 12, 2012

What Made Janey Autistic...#1 in a series

Whenever I run down lists of possible causes of autism, I find no shortage of reasons Janey might be autistic.  Usually, I'm left wondering how she got away with only one case of autism---you'd think she'd have some special kind of double case.  Today, I read this article, about how having the flu and a fever during pregnancy can raise the autism risk, and it brought back one horrible night very vividly for me.  If this was THE cause, it would be a dramatic, specific cause.  So I'll call this #1 in a series, and try to write about some of the other possible causes in the next few days.

That night.  It was about 5pm, and I was tired.  Not regular tired, but a tired beyond anything I'd ever felt in my life.  I was 12 weeks pregnant with Janey.  It had been a very tough start to the pregnancy.  My blood pressure shot up as soon as I got pregnant, from its normally low levels.  It was very obvious this was going to be a pregnancy like my first one, with William, and not like my second one, with Freddy.  The decision was made to put me on blood pressure medication at an appointment at about 10 and a half weeks.  My regular doctor wasn't there.  The doctor who filled in was someone I think introduced herself as some sort of student, or intern.  I wish I remember for sure.  She wasn't a regular in the office.  She prescribed Aldomet, and said "It's extremely safe for pregnancy".  I took her at her word.

After taking the Aldomet for about a week, I got tired.  Not regular tired, but a bone tired.  My face was pale, not a little pale, but people gasped when they saw it pale.  I figured---I was pregnant.  Being pregnant makes you tired.  I remember driving home that fateful night from picking up the boys at school.  I realized I was fighting off sleep, after sleeping much of the day.  When Tony got home, I lay down on my bed.  Suddenly, I realized I felt very, very sick.  It felt like I had felt that way for days, but somehow my mind had not registered that fact.  I decided I should take my temperature.  I couldn't find the thermometer.  I searched and searched, and was about to give up when I did find it.  My temp was 103.  I knew that wasn't good, even in my dazed state.  I called the doctor, and I am not sure if I even made sense.  I said I was coming in, to the evening clinic.  I think they started to ask questions, but I just repeated I was coming in, and hung up.  I called for Tony.  As he was walking over, I think I fainted.  I fell onto the bed, anyway.  He managed to get me in the car, and we went to the office.  By that point I was shaking violently.  When they took my temperature there, I remember the nurse held the thermometer up for me to look at.  It was up to 104.  They called a doctor quickly into the room.

The visit from there is a little hazy.  I know they gave me an IV right away, because I was extremely dehydrated, so much so it was very hard to get the IV started.  I know they took blood.  And I know after a bit, the doctor came back and said I was having a rare reaction to the Aldomet.  My blood tests showed my white blood cells were dangerously low.  My liver function was dangerously compromised.  I was very, very sick.

They sent me to the hospital.  Again, the time there is hazy in my mind.  I know the doctor there said she had never heard of Aldomet causing that kind of reaction.  She researched, and there it was.  It even has a name----Aldomet Fever.  They took all kind of blood, including a kind of special test where they had to scrub my arm for a long time and took what looked like a soda bottle full of blood.  And, at some point, they did an ultrasound.  There was the heartbeat, beating away.

It took me a long time to get better.  And twice more, doctors said things like "I don't think this was caused by the Aldomet"  I printed out a sheet from a Merck Manual online, listing the three things that constitute the type of rare reaction I had---high fever, low white blood cells and liver disfunction.  One of the doctors, I still remember, looked shocked and grabbed the sheet from me.

Much, much later, just a year or so ago, I learned that my aunt also had a terrible reaction to Aldomet.  I hadn't know this.  I also endured a similar reaction when given a sulfa drug a few years ago.  My records show I'm allergic to Aldomet, but no-one made the connection that people who are allergic to Aldomet often also have a sulfa drug allergy.

I remember asking my OB, after my fever had gone down, how this all would affect the baby.  She said that a sickness so severe at 12 weeks usually would have caused a miscarriage.  If it didn't, she said, the baby would probably be fine.  And I know, based on what was known at that time, she believed that.

So---did the Aldomet-provoked sickness cause Janey's autism?  I don't know.  The fever might have, based on recent research.  What it did do, though, was cause me to never again completely trust medication, or, for that matter, doctor's knowledge of medication.  I am very, very grateful that first doctor caught the Aldomet connection.  She was young, and I think she took the time to look up the possible Aldomet reactions.  The older doctors that later questioned the reaction were probably doctors that had prescribed Aldomet for many years, and hadn't seen a reaction.  That's why they call it rare.  But it happens.

I think about that night a lot.  I think I was dying.  I think if I had kept taking the medication, I would have died.  I know that sounds dramatic, but I think it's true.  And a reaction that serious---it's very possible that would have affected Janey, especially at 12 weeks, which always comes up in what I read as a crucial time in development.  But who knows?  As I've said, there are no shortage of other possibilities. If I believed in fate, I'd say that fate wanted Janey to be autistic, and took no chances in making sure she was.

Friday, September 7, 2012

Easy ways to avoid having a child with autism

So you are thinking of having a child, and would like to have one free of autism? Well, you've come to the right place! I've got your easy plan right here! Just follow these instructions and you might well become the lucky parent of the latest autism-free model child!

First of all, you need to make sure you are creating this child with the right person. Take a good hard look at both your pedigrees. Is there anyone with autistic-like tendencies there? Any secret Thomas-the-Tank-Engine lovers? Genetics is one of the possible causes, you know. Assuming that every last one of your ancestors are free from any suspicion of secretly autistic traits, then take a look at the age of the male of your couple. It's a rare case where the woman seems off the hook, but if the male is an older father, it's thought that almost all the new weird genetic mutations that might lead to autism come from his side of the contribution. So you might want to trade him in for a younger model. The other factor you want to check both sides for is the presence of autoimmune disorders, which might play a role in autism. Any diabetes, asthma, arthritis, thyroid disease, lupus, MS, stuff like that? No? All set there? You are ready to get pregnant!

Now there are just a few rules you must follow when pregnant. First of all, don't get sick. Fever during pregnancy is thought to be a culprit. It might be good to isolate yourself all during pregnancy to avoid that. Next, look long and hard at medication you might take. Ask your doctor. Your doctor might say whatever you are taking is just hunky-dory, and then a few years later it's discovered that it isn't. But doctor's orders! So if you take any medication at all, you might want to go back a step and not get pregnant to start with. Avoid being overweight. Avoid getting pre-eclampsia. Avoid being stressed. Avoid getting pregnancy-induced diabetes, or any thyroid problems. Just to be safe, have a picture-perfect pregnancy in all ways.

Now---during the birth. Don't have any birth trauma or lack of oxygen. Don't have your baby prematurely. Hold them right away and let them know how welcome they are. Most people don't believe autism is caused by "refrigerator mothers" subconsciously rejecting their babies anymore, but you know how those things swing back and forth, so avoid ever thinking a single negative thought about the baby.

Now it gets tricky. There's the vaccine question. Science doesn't seem to back up that vaccines or mercury in vaccines cause a problem, but many mothers and blogs and celebrities think it does, so you'll have to decide on that. Make sure the baby doesn't get any infections soon after birth, viral or otherwise. Some people think lately autism is caused by an over-clean environment not teaching the body some early immune responses, so be reasonably casual about germs, but of course, that's subject to change at any point, and if it's later decided dirt causes autism, you'll never forgive yourself. Lack of vitamin D is one theory, so live in a sunny climate. Too much rain could be a problem, so if you get hit with some long rainy spells, move. There's the whole possible diet connection, with lactose and gluten being suspected as problems. Who knows, but why not just never serve any of them to be sure? Early TV could be a problem, so get rid of your set.

And of course, if your child STILL is stubborn enough to show even the slightest autistic trait, you want to nip it in the bud. Have your child screened for autism starting at birth, probably every week will be enough. If you see the slightest sign of it, start ABA about 100 hours a week immediately, until your kid is so normal they could be a model for normalness.

And you know of course this is all very tongue in cheek. I've just been reflecting a lot lately on how the almost daily new ideas about what causes autism must put through the heads of someone determined to do all they can to give their kids a good head start, a nice autism-free life. And the moral is, of course, you can't do that. You could do everything possible known right now, which would result in some crazy doings, and in a few years, it could be determined that everything you thought right was wrong. We just don't know what causes autism. There probably isn't any one thing that causes it. So do what you feel is best. Do what you yourself decide is healthy and reasonable to do. Listen to a good mainstream OB/GYN or pediatrician. Use your own judgement. Don't listen to what bloggers say, including me.

And if, all else failing, you do end up with an autistic child, I'm here to say it's not the end of the world. You aren't a terrible person for somehow not being able to prevent that happening. You are a parent that like many parents from the beginning of time, were dealt a tough hand, but you will deal with it. Your child may not take you to Holland, but they will give you moments of extreme joy along with the hard times. Congratulations on your child, autistic or not.

Sunday, September 2, 2012

Baby Einstein, Julie Clark and "crucial early years"

Janey is a huge fan of Baby Einstein videos. I am not. She loves the music, the toys, the soothing voices, the silly puppets, the whole bit. She's way past their target age, but of course not developmentally that far past, although somewhat even there. We let her watch them, including some in French I bought by mistake at a yard sale.

In every single Baby Einstein video, the founded of Baby Einstein, Julie Clark, gets on and talks about how great she is. Of course, not literally, but that's the message you get. She has two adorable blond girls, who are on the videos a lot, and she says in her sweetie-sweetie voice essentially that if you use her entire line of products, your child will be perfect. Again, not literally. She actually talks about how they are used to INTERACT with your child. Parents are shown interacting, which mostly seems to be pointing to the TV while a baby stares at it. Sure. Like those parents aren't hurrying into the kitchen to make up a cup of coffee and have 10 minutes to read the paper while the kid is entertained. Or maybe they aren't. Maybe THAT'S why I've got an autistic daughter! And of course that kind of message is the hidden one. You want your kid to be NORMAL, don't you? And not just normal, but BETTER than normal? Here's a shortcut way to do that!

And that gets to something that has been bothering me lately---the whole notion of those "crucial early years" And especially as that concept relates to autism. I see articles all over about how to diagnose autism in very young kids, so you don't miss those early years to work with them and make them "normaler" It bothers me for a couple reasons. One is that Janey was a late bloomer when it came to autism. She was not diagnosed until she was 3 years, 4 months, and although I might have been terribly wrong, I don't think she showed serious signs until just before she turned 3. She was discharged from Early Intervention at 3 with few concerns---she has been in it for her motor delays only. There were little oddities, of course, but she was certainly not a slam-dunk, anyone could see it autistic child until that age. So we missed a good potion of those "crucial" years. And then I took what was probably a slacker approach. She got an IEP, she started therapies, but I didn't do a full court press. I didn't insist on 25 hours of ABA a week. She was not even in a full day preschool for the first 2 years (although I was angry about that, but chose to leave her at the school I loved instead of move her to another one where she would get a full day). I didn't ignore her autism---you can read this blog that started right after she was diagnosed if you want to decide for yourself---but I didn't go as all out as I could have.

And why is that? Partly because I was just not sure that I believed any one approach deserved that much of her time. I think ABA is good, done well, which it took us a long time to get done well (thank you, Mr. Ken!). I think strong teachers are good (thanks to all of you!), but I just don't think there is any one thing that needs to be done in huge amounts to "fix" Janey. It's partly that I think it's both too late and not too late. It's too late because although I am not sure what caused Janey's autism, I am pretty sure it's something that happened when I was pregnant, or long before that, when some autistic little genes came together somewhere in Tony's and my ancestors. It's not too late because I think one of the hallmarks of autism is a delayed learning period. Janey still learns new things all the time. It's slow to see, sometimes snail slow, but I see her using words she hasn't before, I see her becoming closer to being toilet trained, I see her accurately "reading" her videos to see which one she wants, I see her asking more easily for what she needs, I see her catching balls and running like a champ and getting excited when I tell her school is in 4 days.

I don't think Janey is going to catch up, to be "normal". Of course, I dream of it. Of course, I hope I'm wrong. But I don't think it's fair to her to spend her whole childhood in pursuit of that dream. If she can be happy, if she can enjoy life, on the days I see that dream within reach, she is living a valid life right now. Despite what I think Julie Clark would say.

Friday, May 25, 2012

Okay, another check on the checklist

The latest news from the world of autism? Fever during pregnancy can double the risk of autism. Here's an article. Lovely. Another way I caused Janey's autism. It's like I went into the future, found a list of all the ways they were going to decide autism could be caused, made up a checklist and tried to hit them all. If there was something called double autism, she'd probably have that, I hit so many of those checkmarks.

The fever I had, at 12 weeks, was pretty severe. It was caused by my reaction to Aldomet, which I was put on due to getting preeclampsia (high blood pressure and other problems) early in my pregnancy. Of course, preeclampsia is another risk factor recently discovered for autism. Of course.

I can't wish they wouldn't discover all this stuff. I want to help other mothers-to-be. And I know that I certainly didn't MEAN to put Janey at risk for autism. I would have done ANYTHING during my pregnancy to avoid it, if I had known. But I didn't. Nor did Tony, who was an older father, one of the rare instances where fathers can join in the guilt parade. I didn't know another medication I was taking, which I repeatedly asked my OB if I should stop taking, would later to said to be another possible cause.

I know it doesn't do a bit of good for me, or for Janey, to get upset over all this. I don't have a time machine. I can't change anything. And I should feel happy for others, who might not have a child with autism due to all the recent discoveries. But of course, I feel guilty. That's what mothers do.

Monday, April 9, 2012

What causes autism? And does it matter?

Well, of course it does matter, but by that, I mean does it matter to children and families already living with autism? It certainly matters to those future children who could potentially be prevented from becoming autistic if we knew what was causing it, but in a lot of ways, it doesn't matter much to Janey, or to me, in terms of our day to day life.

That's not to say I don't wonder, but I can't say I think a huge amount about it. That's been hard lately, as every single day, it seems, there's a new article out there with a new potential cause. They can't all be right, or maybe they can---I do think autism is caused in different ways in different kids, and they might ALL be a cause. But that leaves more answers than questions if it's true---which one caused MY child's autism? And it opens up the feeling that I think probably almost all parents of a child with autism have had---"it's my fault somehow" I know rationally it isn't. I don't take the credit for Janey being so beautiful, or my sons being quite the bright guys, or for William being musical or Freddy being a good actor. I don't take the blame for Freddy's health issues or any character flaws either of them might or might not have. So it stands to reason I shouldn't take the blame for Janey's autism, and in general, I choose not to.

But the list goes on---genetics, vaccines, older fathers, close spacing between children, overweight mothers, medication taken during pregnancy, mercury, thyroid problems during pregnancy, pre-eclampsia, ultrasounds, low birth weight, lack of oxygen at birth, diet, autoimmune disease, viral infections, brain defects, rain, too much TV, Tylenol...well, a huge amount of things. A fair amount of the list applies to Janey, making me think it would probably have been more of a surprise had she NOT been autistic, almost. But of course that's not the way to think, and it shows the problems with a lot of those theories---why don't ALL kids with those risk factor become autistic? Obviously there must be more than one factor at work in most cases.

If I personally had to guess about the cause of Janey's autism, at the current time I'd put three factors in the most likely list. First is the autoimmune disorder idea. Almost everyone on either side of our family has some kind of autoimmune problem. This goes along with factor two--preeclampsia. I was severely affected by this during my first pregnancy, and was to a fair extent while pregnant with Janey. My third thought is the severe reaction I had to a blood pressure medication I was given at 12 weeks while pregnant with Janey. These three factors all tie together. But who knows, really? I think most of autism is probably like that---caused by an interaction of factors. This is why I try never to get into the fray of arguments about what causes autism. I think everyone is right and everyone is wrong. Some cases of autism probably are caused by vaccines. Some are caused by genetics, some by birth injury. Most by a mix and match list of many factors.

But the end result, no matter how you get there, is autism. It's like the stupid Holland story. No matter why you ended up in Holland instead of in whatever country you were aiming for, you're still in Holland. I'm content to let the research and battle over what caused Janey's autism fight on without me joining in. My fight now is to give her the most meaningful life I can.

Thursday, March 29, 2012

1 in 88???

The big news today of course is that the CDC says autism is being diagnosed even more often than before. (here's the article) I have two reactions, both based of course as anything I say here on my own personal thoughts and feelings.

First, I don't think the rate of autism is truly rising as fast as they say. I think the rate of autism being DIAGNOSED certainly is, but there's a difference. My evidence here is my own children. As I've talked about before here, my older son was originally diagnosed as autistic, later, at age 4, changed to Aspergers. As the years went by, the diagnosis seemed less apt to me. At around age 8, he was in a couple studies, and testing during both showed he didn't at that time meet the criteria for Aspergers. Of course, autism spectrum disorders are supposed to be for life, except in rare cases. Those cases are the kinds books and movies are made about, where incredibly dedicated parents (or Jenny McCarthy) do everything in their power to "cure" their child. That wasn't me. I'm dedicated, but not that focused. William got good quality inclusive special education help and therapy at school, no ABA, no diets, no miracle cures. He just, in my eyes, didn't actually have Aspergers. He was a preemie, he had a strong and unusual personality, but he wasn't on the autistic spectrum. Today, William is 17, the top student in his class, a pretty decent guitar player and a very, very cool person. He's quirky, but we're all quirky. He has not had any special services at school since 5th grade. None. But the state still considers, if they have statistics some place, that he is autistic. We still get mailings from the Department of Retardation for him, which I hide and which I have tried and tried to call and have stopped. He's looking at some Ivy League schools---a stretch, but not an incredibly big one. I don't think he needs those services. But yes, he'd be counted as one of the 1 in 88.

And then there's Janey. I don't need to tell her whole story. But she's one of the one in 88, and rightfully so. Knowing the two of them fairly well, as I can say I do---it's a huge world of difference. About as huge as I can imagine. Aspergers, however, even for people that really do have Aspergers, is grouped right along with autism. Kids like the son of a close friend, who is probably the single brightest person I've ever known, are grouped with Janey. This paints a very confusing picture for the general public. Is autism someone like Janey, or is it something else entirely? If you can only get services to help your high functioning kids, kids that might very much indeed need help, by calling them autistic, would you? I guess I did, once. I didn't call him that, but I didn't know any better, and I accepted him being called that, something that now that he's old enough to understand, upsets him a great deal when he thinks of it, although I wish it didn't.

So that's my first thought. My other thought---if this is true, if somehow the rate of autism keeps going up and up and up, what are we going to do about it? It's a horrible emergency, if it's true. If one in 88 kids is going to need help in life like Janey is going to keep, then there's going to be a HUGE cost. A monetary cost, but also a huge cost to families. I know how having a child with autism affects a family. I love Janey with all my heart, more than I can possibly say. But she is tough. Very, very tough. And I have a supportive husband, great older kids, a wonderful school system with fantastic teachers and therapists---I have all that. If I didn't, I don't know how I'd do it at all. And if there are really that many kids out there with autism---well, the nation is in for a shock.

I worry about the short attention span of causes. If autism is rare and something fascinating and interesting, celebrities and all will jump on the bandwagon and help. But if autism is common and wearing and no longer a novelty, I can picture a backlash. This is the case whether these kids have Janey-type autism or Asperger type autism. I can see public skepticism, public boredom. It's how the country works. For a while, everyone thought about Haiti all the time, or Japan after the earthquake, or New Orleans, or so on. Then, gradually, they fall out of the news. and although there are still dedicated people working for those causes, people's minds can only seem to hold so much caring at a time. I worry about that. Because all these autistic kids aren't going any place.

And so I'll do what seem to always do---think extremely locally. So locally that the local place is my own house, my own family. I will be there for my own little 1 in 88.

Tuesday, November 15, 2011

Janey and the dogs


My sister had a copy of the picture I'd been looking for, showing Janey with 4 big dogs. We were at my cousin's house in Washington, during our big trip, and the whole trip, Janey was deeply in love with dogs. My aunt had a wonderful old Rhodesian Ridgeback, Gidget, and Janey loved her so much. It's part of why it's so perplexing to me that she has such a horrible phobia of dogs now.

Thinking about the dogs on that trip always makes me think about how the trip affected Janey. We drove cross country to Olympia, Washington. 6 days out and 6 days back, 9 days there. It was a wonderful trip, a dream come true for me. The boys and Tony loved it too. And mostly, at the time, Janey seemed to enjoy it. She turned 3 during the trip. Now, looking back, we date her autism starting to the trip. Before we left, I have to say she was showing a few small signs, and I was first starting to have questions. She started preschool a week or so after we got back, and within a few weeks, her talking pretty much ended. I always wonder if there could have been a connection. She spent long hours in her carseat, but she was next to Freddy, and we are talkers---there was certainly almost no time that she wasn't surrounded by conversation. But could she have gotten a blood clot from all the sitting? She wasn't sick on the trip, I don't remember any day during it she acted radically different, but in a way, the non-autistic Janey left us somewhere around the time of that trip.

I resist thinking about Janey before the autism. I try to convince myself often she really wasn't okay, even then. But then I think about how she was in Early Intervention all those 3 years, because of her severe physical delays, and no-one once suspected autism, and those were professionals trained to see it. I remember the last time the PT saw her, and Janey was totally discharged from EI. We laughed about how at least we knew she didn't have speech issues. It breaks my heart to think of that, sometimes. We have videos of Janey talking. I watched part of one, once. I suddenly screamed during it, a scream that I didn't even recognize as myself. I turned it off and told Tony I never wanted to see it again.

This is why although I don't think vaccines caused Janey's autism in any way (she had none anywhere near the time of her regression), I can understand very well how people that believe that did cause their children's autism feel. If she HAD had a vaccine at that time, it would be very hard not to associate it with the horrible regression.

I do think Janey always had the seeds of autism. She talked, she was social, but when I am really thinking about it, she was always a little bit something hard to define. She talked more to me than to anyone else, and there were friends of mine who had rarely heard her talk. I remember thinking when she was 2 or so that her words were like bubbles---beautiful and perfect, but when she wasn't talking, it was hard to picture that she could. But it was nothing like afterward, or like now.

So, like the Janey that loved dogs, that Janey isn't here any more. We have a Janey, and I thank everything there is to thank for that. I do miss my other Janey sometimes, though.